Avazzia BEST vs TENS or E-STEM electro devices |
|||
| Avazzia BEST™ devices
are FDA cleared as microcurrent biofeedback TENS devices for the symptomatic relief and
management of chronic, intractable pain, and adjunctive treatment in the management of
post surgical and post-traumatic pain.
Technical Comparison |
|||
Avazzia BEST™ |
Conventional TENS |
||
| 21st Century Technology | 1970's Technology | ||
| High intensity, very low current, burst pulses | Low intensity, higher current, long duration pulses | ||
| Voltage Range: 0-450 volts | Voltage Range: 0-40 volts | ||
| Amperage Range: Microamps ( 10-6 Amps) | Amperage Range: Milliamps (10-3 Amps) | ||
| Signals in the frequency range of 1Hz to 1000 Hz | Signals in the frequency range of 1Hz to 100 Hz | ||
| Damped asymmetrical biphasic sinusoidal waveform | Square waveform, mono-phasic or biphasic | ||
| Signaling always varies based upon changes in impedance of the tissue | symmetrical or asymmetrical | ||
| The Avazzia BEST™ device forms a somatic biofeedback between the device and the tissue | No biofeedback | ||
| Performance Comparison | |||
| Somatic biofeedback prevents neurological habituation and accomodation, for more effective pain management | Develops neurological habituatgion and accommodation, which severely limits effectiveness of pain management | ||
| Effectiveness lasts hours after treatment | Effectiveness often stops when treatment ends | ||
Return to Avazzia Product Details Page